Intro / Problem
Internal teams often want AI to help people find information, draft repeatable materials, summarize documents, or answer common questions. But an assistant is only useful when the source material, review process, and boundaries are clear.
Sixth City AI helps teams evaluate assistant-style concepts before assuming they are ready to build.
Start with approved sources
Assistant concepts should be tied to source material that leadership approves for use. The goal is to support clearer work, not to imply that an assistant knows everything or always gives a correct answer.
Keep human review visible
People should check outputs, handle exceptions, confirm context, and own final decisions. Assistant-style support should not replace accountability, manager judgment, expert review, or appropriate oversight.
Define role-specific boundaries
Different teams may need different boundaries. An HR team, operations team, sales team, or leadership group may each need different source rules, review expectations, and escalation paths.
Buildout is separately scoped
Assistant concepting, readiness review, source review, and workflow scoping do not automatically include technical buildout, integration, deployment, privacy review, cybersecurity review, or legal/compliance review.
What This Helps With
- Reviewing internal assistant use cases before buildout
- Identifying approved sources and review needs
- Clarifying employee-facing boundaries
- Connecting assistant concepts to governance and data readiness
What to Expect
- Identify common questions, workflows, or knowledge-access problems.
- Review approved sources, sensitive-data concerns, and human review needs.
- Clarify role-specific boundaries and escalation paths.
- Decide whether a concept should move toward workflow redesign, data readiness, or separately scoped buildout.